There's Julie O Toole's list of questions
Or the Strober/Johnson perspective.
So from the clinical perspective, the message that modern neuroscience underscores is: (1) that an invigorated focus
on therapy skill is warranted, addressing not only
the individual’s belief structure, but also the social
context in which they live; and (2) applying technique, whether in manual form or instructed, can
be valuable, but more is needed, especially when it
comes to work with difficult cases. In our view, the
further needed element is not easily measured, but
patients and families feel its presence and they
speak of it often. It is not one single thing, but
rather a set of skills with different facets: the
uniquely refined ability of the therapist to sit long
hours sifting patiently and thoughtfully through
strains and secrets the human psyche can easily
cloak; insight into what this messy tangle of conflicting tensions, puzzling emotions, and disparaging self-beliefs reveals about a patient’s (and family’s) misery; the ability to translate this understanding into prose eloquent enough, and
delivered with the strength of conviction needed,
for our patient (and family) to ‘‘feel’’ they best give
it deeper thought; and then to steer the treatment
in the direction needed and escalate its intensity
should progress lag. To appreciate science is one
thing, but in the clinical realm there is no substitute for well-honed skills, intuitiveness, and decisiveness when facing AN’s challenge.
No comments:
Post a Comment